Claim · model-written summary
Crop injury to glufosinate-resistant corn was minimal with glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinations.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1 - Treatment
- glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinationse1
- Outcome
- Crop injurye1
- Direction
- minimale1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Crop injury to glufosinate-resistant corn was minimal with glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinations”
Title
Glufosinate Combinations and Row Spacing for Weed Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)1
CURTIS A. JONES; JAMES M. CHANDLER; JOHN E. MORRISON; et al. Weed Technology 2001. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2001)015[0141:gcarsf]2.0.co;2
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Atrazine plus glufosinate enhanced Palmer amaranth control compared to glufosinate alone in glufosinate-resistant corn.
- Intervention effect Glufosinate control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory and entireleaf morningglory was greater than 82%.
- Intervention effect Glufosinate control of Texas panicum, smellmellon and browntop panicum was greater than 82%.
- Intervention effect Glufosinate control of toothed spurge was greater than 82%.
- Intervention effect Common sunflower control with glufosinate was greater than 95%.
- Intervention effect Atrazine followed by glufosinate provided at least 94% control of all weed species.
- Intervention effect Atrazine followed by glufosinate was the most consistent herbicide system used.
- Intervention effect Row spacing had little effect on weed control.