Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate applied alone, with, or following atrazine controlled velvetleaf 90% or greater.
- Taxon
- sweet cornt0
- Treatment
- Glufosinate applied alone, with, or following atrazinee0
- Interactor
- velvetleaf
Abutilon theophrastie0weed - Outcome
- controllede0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 90% or greatere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate applied alone, with, or following atrazine controlled velvetleaf 90% or greater”
t0“PAT-Transformed Sweet Corn (Zea mays)”
Title
Lee R. Van Wychen; R. Gordon Harvey; Mark J. Vangessel; et al. Weed Technology 1999. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00044997
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Sequential glufosinate applications 10 to 18 d apart at 0.4 and 0.3 kg ai/ha controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, velvetleaf, wild-proso millet and fall panicum 90% or better at all locations.
- Intervention effect Weed control varied little among 0.3, 0.4, or 0.3 and 0.3 (sequential) kg/ha glufosinate rates.
- Intervention effect Glufosinate applied alone, with, or following atrazine was less consistent on common ragweed and common lambsquarters (73 to 100% control).
- Intervention effect Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE and glufosinate alone POST provided inconsistent wild-proso millet and fall panicum control (43 to 99%).
- Intervention effect Metolachlor followed by glufosinate improved consistency of grass control (above 76%).
- Intervention effect Glufosinate followed by cultivation provided 80% or greater control of velvetleaf and wild-proso millet.
- Intervention effect Glufosinate did not injure or delay maturity of PAT-transformed sweet corn.
- Intervention effect Sweet corn treated with glufosinate yielded greater than or equal to sweet corn that was hand-weeded or received a standard herbicide treatment.