Paper · 2005 · Weed Technology

Incorporating Foramsulfuron into Annual Weed Control Systems for Corn1

JEFFREY A. BUNTING; CHRISTY L. SPRAGUE; DEAN E. RIECHERS

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2000, 2001, and 2002 at Brownstown, DeKalb, Perry, and Urbana, IL, to evaluate weed control and corn tolerance from postemergence (POST) applications of foramsulfuron in sequential and total-POST herbicide programs. Foramsulfuron applied alone controlled giant foxtail, fall panicum, and redroot pigweed 88, 99, and 99%, respectively, 28 d after treatment (DAT), which was comparable with the standard treatment of nicosulfuron. However, control of common cocklebur, velvetleaf, and common lambsquarters was significantly higher with foramsulfuron compared with nicosulfuron. Sequential herbicide programs of atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided greater than 85% control of giant foxtail, fall panicum, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common waterhemp, and redroot pigweed. Of the sequential herbicide treatments, atrazine applied PRE followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided the greatest Pennsylvania smartweed control. A PRE application of either atrazine or isoxaflutole was needed before a POST application of foramsulfuron to control common lambsquarters. POST tank mixtures of foramsulfuron with atrazine, dicamba, and dicamba plus diflufenzopyr improved control of Pennsylvania smartweed, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common lambsquarters, and common waterhemp when compared with foramsulfuron applied alone. The tank mixture of foramsulfuron with mesotrione improved control of all species, except Pennsylvania smartweed, common lambsquarters, and common cocklebur. Foramsulfuron tank mixtures with carfentrazone did not improve control of any weed species to commercial acceptance. Adjuvant selection was important for POST tank mixtures. Control of giant foxtail and fall panicum was reduced when atrazine was tank mixed with foramsulfuron and crop oil concentrate (COC). However, when methylated seed oil (MSO) was added to the atrazine–foramsulfuron tank mixture instead of COC, giant foxtail and fall panicum control were similar to foramsulfuron applied alone.Nomenclature: Atrazine; carfentrazone; dicamba; diflufenzopyr, 2-[1-[[[(3,5-difluorophenyl)amino]carbonyl]hydrazono]ethyl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid; foramsulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidiny)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-4-(formylamino)-N,N-dimethylbenzamide; isoxaflutole; mesotrione; S-metolachlor; common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. #3 XANST; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEAL; common waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer. # AMATA; fall panicum, Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. # PANDI; giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herm. # SETFA; Pennsylvania smartweed, Polygonum pennsylvanicum L. # POLPY; redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMARE; velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus # ABUTH; corn, Zea mays L.Additional index words: Antagonism, tank mixture, total-POST.Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18); COC, crop oil concentrate; DAT, days after treatment; MSO, methylated seed oil; NIS, nonionic surfactant; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence; UAN, urea ammonium nitrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron alone controlled giant foxtail by 88% at 28 days, comparably to nicosulfuron.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron applied alonee0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
controlled giant foxtaile0
Direction
controllede0
Value
88e0
Qualifier
28 d after treatment (DAT)e0
Comparator
nicosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron applied alone controlled giant foxtail, fall panicum, and redroot pigweed 88, 99, and 99%, respectively, 28 d after treatment (DAT), which was comparable with the standard treatment of nicosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron alone controlled fall panicum by 99% at 28 days, comparably to nicosulfuron.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron applied alonee0
Interactor
fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0weed
Outcome
fall panicume0
Direction
controllede0
Value
99e0
Comparator
nicosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Panicum dichotomiflorum
Panicum dichotomiflorum · InteractorAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron applied alone controlled giant foxtail, fall panicum, and redroot pigweed 88, 99, and 99%, respectively, 28 d after treatment (DAT), which was comparable with the standard treatment of nicosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron alone controlled redroot pigweed by 99% at 28 days, comparably to nicosulfuron.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron applied alonee0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
redroot pigweede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
99e0
Comparator
nicosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron applied alone controlled giant foxtail, fall panicum, and redroot pigweed 88, 99, and 99%, respectively, 28 d after treatment (DAT), which was comparable with the standard treatment of nicosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron controlled common cocklebur significantly better than nicosulfuron.

Treatment
foramsulfurone0
Interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
control of common cocklebure0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nicosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of common cocklebur, velvetleaf, and common lambsquarters was significantly higher with foramsulfuron compared with nicosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron controlled velvetleaf significantly better than nicosulfuron.

Treatment
foramsulfurone0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
velvetleafe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nicosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of common cocklebur, velvetleaf, and common lambsquarters was significantly higher with foramsulfuron compared with nicosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron controlled common lambsquarters significantly better than nicosulfuron.

Treatment
foramsulfurone0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
common lambsquarterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nicosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of common cocklebur, velvetleaf, and common lambsquarters was significantly higher with foramsulfuron compared with nicosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential preemergence herbicides followed by foramsulfuron gave more than 85% giant foxtail control.

Treatment
atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfurone0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
control of giant foxtaile0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential herbicide programs of atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided greater than 85% control of giant foxtail, fall panicum, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common waterhemp, and redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential programs gave more than 85% fall panicum control.

Treatment
atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfurone0
Interactor
fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0weed
Outcome
fall panicume0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Panicum dichotomiflorum
Panicum dichotomiflorum · InteractorAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential herbicide programs of atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided greater than 85% control of giant foxtail, fall panicum, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common waterhemp, and redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential programs gave more than 85% common cocklebur control.

Treatment
atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfurone0
Interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
common cocklebure0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential herbicide programs of atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided greater than 85% control of giant foxtail, fall panicum, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common waterhemp, and redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential programs gave more than 85% velvetleaf control.

Treatment
atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfurone0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
velvetleafe0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential herbicide programs of atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided greater than 85% control of giant foxtail, fall panicum, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common waterhemp, and redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential programs gave more than 85% common waterhemp control.

Treatment
atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfurone0
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
common waterhempe0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential herbicide programs of atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided greater than 85% control of giant foxtail, fall panicum, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common waterhemp, and redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential programs gave more than 85% redroot pigweed control.

Treatment
atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfurone0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
redroot pigweede0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential herbicide programs of atrazine, S-metolachlor, or isoxaflutole applied preemergence (PRE) followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided greater than 85% control of giant foxtail, fall panicum, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common waterhemp, and redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by foramsulfuron gave the greatest Pennsylvania smartweed control among sequential treatments.

Treatment
atrazine applied PRE followed by a POST application of foramsulfurone0
Interactor
Pennsylvania smartweede0weed
Outcome
Pennsylvania smartweed controle0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
sequential herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the sequential herbicide treatments, atrazine applied PRE followed by a POST application of foramsulfuron provided the greatest Pennsylvania smartweed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence atrazine or isoxaflutole was needed before foramsulfuron to control common lambsquarters.

Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
needed before a POST application of foramsulfuron to control common lambsquarterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A PRE application of either atrazine or isoxaflutole was needed before a POST application of foramsulfuron to control common lambsquarters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron tank mixtures with atrazine, dicamba or dicamba plus diflufenzopyr improved control of five named weeds.

Treatment
POST tank mixtures of foramsulfuron with atrazine, dicamba, and dicamba plus diflufenzopyre0
Outcome
control of Pennsylvania smartweed, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common lambsquarters, and common waterhempe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
foramsulfuron applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POST tank mixtures of foramsulfuron with atrazine, dicamba, and dicamba plus diflufenzopyr improved control of Pennsylvania smartweed, common cocklebur, velvetleaf, common lambsquarters, and common waterhemp when compared with foramsulfuron applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron with mesotrione improved weed control except for three species.

Treatment
foramsulfuron with mesotrionee0
Outcome
control of all speciese0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
except Pennsylvania smartweed, common lambsquarters, and common cocklebure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tank mixture of foramsulfuron with mesotrione improved control of all species, except Pennsylvania smartweed, common lambsquarters, and common cocklebur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carfentrazone mixtures did not improve weed control to commercial acceptance.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron tank mixtures with carfentrazonee0
Outcome
control of any weed speciese0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron tank mixtures with carfentrazone did not improve control of any weed species to commercial acceptance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine mixed with foramsulfuron and crop oil concentrate reduced giant foxtail and fall panicum control.

Treatment
atrazine was tank mixed with foramsulfuron and crop oil concentrate (COC)e0
Outcome
Control of giant foxtail and fall panicume0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of giant foxtail and fall panicum was reduced when atrazine was tank mixed with foramsulfuron and crop oil concentrate (COC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With methylated seed oil instead of crop oil concentrate, control of giant foxtail and fall panicum resembled foramsulfuron alone.

Treatment
methylated seed oil (MSO) was added to the atrazine–foramsulfuron tank mixturee0
Outcome
giant foxtail and fall panicum controle0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
foramsulfuron applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when methylated seed oil (MSO) was added to the atrazine–foramsulfuron tank mixture instead of COC, giant foxtail and fall panicum control were similar to foramsulfuron applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑

isoxaflutole · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

foramsulfuron · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

atrazine · Panicum dichotomiflorum · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

isoxaflutole · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

atrazine · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

atrazine · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

mesotrione · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

dicamba · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

8 of 17 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.