Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Carfentrazone mixtures did not improve weed control to commercial acceptance.

A claim from Incorporating Foramsulfuron into Annual Weed Control Systems for Corn1 · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carfentrazone mixtures did not improve weed control to commercial acceptance.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron tank mixtures with carfentrazonee0
Outcome
control of any weed speciese0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron tank mixtures with carfentrazone did not improve control of any weed species to commercial acceptance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1724
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69

Title

Incorporating Foramsulfuron into Annual Weed Control Systems for Corn1

JEFFREY A. BUNTING; CHRISTY L. SPRAGUE; DEAN E. RIECHERS Weed Technology 2005. doi:10.1614/wt-04-063r1

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-b1e2826ffa3cd2e703f920dc92d0e89dcb092bce3c84660ccd689895e20c2bdf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

foramsulfuron · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.