Paper · 2005

Efficacy of Foramsulfuron Plus Biopower for Weed Contol in Sweet Corn

Chen Wen

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper discusses the efficacy of foramsulfuron used with Biopower at different concentration ratios for weed control in corn. When applied to corn in the seedling stage, foramsulfuron plus Biopower controlled several species of weeds. Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha provided the best control, with weed stand and fresh weight reductions of 92.2 and 95.8%, respectively, 40d after application, and a crop yield increase of 30.1%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron plus Biopower controlled several weed species when applied to corn at the seedling stage.

Organ / stage
seedling stagee1
Treatment
foramsulfuron plus Biopowere1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
controlled several species of weedse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When applied to corn in the seedling stage, foramsulfuron plus Biopower controlled several species of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha reduced weed stand by 92.2 percent 40 days after application.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/hae2
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weed stande2
Direction
reductionse2
Value
92.2e2
Qualifier
40d after applicatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When applied to corn in the seedling stage, foramsulfuron plus Biopower controlled several species of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–237 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha provided the best control, with weed stand and fresh weight reductions of 92.2 and 95.8%, respectively, 40d after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha reduced weed fresh weight by 95.8 percent 40 days after application.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/hae2
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
fresh weighte2
Direction
reductionse2
Value
95.8%e2
Qualifier
40d after applicatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When applied to corn in the seedling stage, foramsulfuron plus Biopower controlled several species of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–237 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha provided the best control, with weed stand and fresh weight reductions of 92.2 and 95.8%, respectively, 40d after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha gave the best weed control among the tested rates.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/hae2
Outcome
controle2
Direction
beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When applied to corn in the seedling stage, foramsulfuron plus Biopower controlled several species of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–237 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha provided the best control, with weed stand and fresh weight reductions of 92.2 and 95.8%, respectively, 40d after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha increased crop yield by 30.1 percent.

Treatment
Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/hae2
Outcome
crop yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
30.1%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When applied to corn in the seedling stage, foramsulfuron plus Biopower controlled several species of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–237 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foramsulfuron + Biopower at 165 + 1200 g/ha provided the best control, with weed stand and fresh weight reductions of 92.2 and 95.8%, respectively, 40d after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–408 · show in text ↑
e3

“and a crop yield increase of 30.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–444 · show in text ↑

foramsulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

foramsulfuron · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

foramsulfuron · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

foramsulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.