Paper · 1974 · Weed Science

Yellow Nutsedge, Giant Green Foxtail, and Fall Panicum Control in Corn

J. V. Parochetti

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a 3-year field study in corn ( Zea mays L.), several herbicides and combinations were studied for the control of yellow nutsedge ( Cyperus esculentus L.), giant green foxtail [ Setaria viridis var. major (Gaud.) Posp.], and fall panicum ( Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.). Best yellow nutsedge control (87 to 88%) resulted from applications of 4.48 kg/ha of either alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] preplant incorporated or atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] preplant incorporated plus atrazine postemergence with a phytobland oil. Between 72 to 83% control of yellow nutsedge resulted from applications of 2.24 kg/ha of alachlor, 4.48 kg/ha of butylate ( S -ethyl diisobutylthiocarbamate), and combinations of atrazine plus butylate. Greater than 90% control of giant green foxtail and fall panicum resulted from butylate plus atrazine or alachlor; postemergence applications of atrazine resulted in significantly less control of fall panicum or giant green foxtail.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor at 4.48 kg/ha achieved 87 to 88% yellow nutsedge control.

Treatment
4.48 kg/ha of either alachlore0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedge controle0
Direction
Beste0
Value
87 to 88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best yellow nutsedge control (87 to 88%) resulted from applications of 4.48 kg/ha of either alachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yellow Nutsedge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine treatment achieved 87 to 88% yellow nutsedge control.

Treatment
atrazinee0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedge controle0
Direction
Beste0
Value
87 to 88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best yellow nutsedge control (87 to 88%) resulted from applications of 4.48 kg/ha of either alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] preplant incorporated or atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] preplant incorporated plus atrazine postemergence with a phytobland oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alachlor at 2.24 kg/ha achieved 72 to 83% yellow nutsedge control.

Treatment
2.24 kg/ha of alachlore0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
control of yellow nutsedgee0
Value
72 to 83%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between 72 to 83% control of yellow nutsedge resulted from applications of 2.24 kg/ha of alachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butylate at 4.48 kg/ha achieved 72 to 83% yellow nutsedge control.

Treatment
4.48 kg/ha of butylatee0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
control of yellow nutsedgee0
Value
72 to 83%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between 72 to 83% control of yellow nutsedge resulted from applications of 2.24 kg/ha of alachlor, 4.48 kg/ha of butylate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus butylate achieved 72 to 83% yellow nutsedge control.

Treatment
combinations of atrazine plus butylatee0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
control of yellow nutsedgee0
Value
72 to 83%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between 72 to 83% control of yellow nutsedge resulted from applications of 2.24 kg/ha of alachlor, 4.48 kg/ha of butylate ( S -ethyl diisobutylthiocarbamate), and combinations of atrazine plus butylate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–798 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butylate plus atrazine or alachlor controlled giant green foxtail by over 90%.

Treatment
butylate plus atrazine or alachlore0
Interactor
giant green foxtaile0weed
Outcome
control of giant green foxtaile0
Value
Greater than 90%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater than 90% control of giant green foxtail and fall panicum resulted from butylate plus atrazine or alachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butylate plus atrazine or alachlor controlled fall panicum by over 90%.

Treatment
butylate plus atrazine or alachlore0
Interactor
fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0weed
Outcome
control of giant green foxtail and fall panicume0
Value
Greater than 90%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Panicum dichotomiflorum
Panicum dichotomiflorum · InteractorAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater than 90% control of giant green foxtail and fall panicum resulted from butylate plus atrazine or alachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence atrazine gave significantly less fall panicum control.

Treatment
postemergence applications of atrazinee0
Interactor
fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0weed
Outcome
control of fall panicume0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Panicum dichotomiflorum
Panicum dichotomiflorum · InteractorAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postemergence applications of atrazine resulted in significantly less control of fall panicum or giant green foxtail”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence atrazine gave significantly less giant green foxtail control.

Treatment
postemergence applications of atrazinee0
Interactor
giant green foxtaile0weed
Outcome
control of fall panicum or giant green foxtaile0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postemergence applications of atrazine resulted in significantly less control of fall panicum or giant green foxtail”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“field study in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑

atrazine · Panicum dichotomiflorum · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

alachlor · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

herbicide · Panicum dichotomiflorum · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.