Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Metolachlor applied preemergence increased goosegrass control to the metolachlor plus atrazine level.

A claim from Weed Management in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor applied preemergence increased goosegrass control to the metolachlor plus atrazine level.

Treatment
Metolachlor applied PREe0
Interactor
goosegrasse0weedt0
Outcome
goosegrass controle0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
metolachlor plus atrazinee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metolachlor applied PRE or atrazine mixed with glufosinate increased goosegrass control to that achieved with metolachlor plus atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1293
t0

“Weed Management in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56

Title

Weed Management in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)

A. Stanley Culpepper; Alan C. York Weed Technology 1999. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00041816

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-dfd61d10dbf65b0056ac6200586f441db2a9a997320ad1b703f5c09e0c4faf41 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

metolachlor · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.