Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Continuous P and K application increased nutrient content and uptake in rapeseed.
TreatmentContinuous application of P and K fertilizer e0 Outcomenutrient content and nutrient uptake e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Interactor role Second interactor Second interactor role Comparator Setting Value Qualifier
Verbatim
t0 “rapeseed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 e0 “Continuous application of P and K fertilizer were beneficial to provide balanced nutrient,increased nutrient content and nutrient uptake in rapeseed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–483 Other claims from this paper (3) Record rev-543f74e2a7fff7b15086a05f9aa5f7e20c4fb969793a6fffc952f197b4560009 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer
potassium · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape) Positive and negative results 10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction
no effect negative positive positive positive positive positive positive 1 paper more in this group
See all 10 papers → phosphorus · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape) Positive and negative results 34 papers: 28 positive, 6 negative or no effect
27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction
negative negative no effect negative negative negative positive positive 25 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers → fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape) Positive and negative results 109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect
94 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
negative no effect negative negative negative no effect no effect no effect 100 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers → Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.