Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The listed herbicide programs gave soybean branch numbers per plant, pods per plant and seed yield comparable to the weed-free control.

A claim from Weed control in conventional soybean with pendimethalin followed by imazethapyr plus imazamox/quizalofop · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed herbicide programs gave soybean branch numbers per plant, pods per plant and seed yield comparable to the weed-free control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Pendimethalin followed by imazethapyr + imazamox at 70 g ha−1 at 28 DAS, imazethapyr + imazamox at 60 or 70 g ha−1 at 21 DAS followed by quizalofop-p-ethyl at 37.5 g ha−1 at 42 DASe0
Outcome
soybean branch numbers per plant, number of pods per plant, and soybean seed yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
weed-free controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“conventional soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–36
e0

“Pendimethalin followed by imazethapyr + imazamox at 70 g ha−1 at 28 DAS, imazethapyr + imazamox at 60 or 70 g ha−1 at 21 DAS followed by quizalofop-p-ethyl at 37.5 g ha−1 at 42 DAS resulted in soybean branch numbers per plant, number of pods per plant, and soybean seed yield comparable to weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1315

Title

Weed control in conventional soybean with pendimethalin followed by imazethapyr plus imazamox/quizalofop

Ramawatar Yadav; Makhan Singh; Simerjeet Kaur; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1139/cjps-2016-0123

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-55d845ffc5fcee20cb4177df387f3874c4d3d55cdd0ce483487cba2e54ddfeaf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

pendimethalin · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

47 papers: 37 positive, 10 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Pre-emergence pendimethalin gave soybean grain yields similar to weed-free plots

    Bio-efficacy of Acetochlor for Weed Control in Soybean · 2003 · compared with weed-free treatment

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

85 papers: 66 positive, 19 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    The 150 g/ha treatment gave maximum branch, pod and seed per pod counts.

    Efficacy of imazethapyr on weed management in soybean · 2011 · compared with weedy check and imazethapyr 10% at 50 g/ha

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

imazamox · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.