Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nutrition with silicon increased the gross production value of sugar beet by 1.3-22.9% over the research period.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise2 - Treatment
- foliar nutrition with silicone2
- Outcome
- gross production valuee2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 1.3-22.9%e2
- Qualifier
- for the research periode2
- Setting
- Sahryńe1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In the years 2015-2016 in Sahryń (50°41′ N, 23°47’ E) a field experiment”
e2“The gross production value of sugar beet due to foliar nutrition with silicon increased by 1.3-22.9% for the research period, and the net production value by 5.5-19.0%”
Title
PROFITABILITY OF SUGAR BEET FOLIAR NUTRITION WITH SILICON
Arkadiusz Artyszak; Ewelina Klarzyńska; Magda Litwińczuk-Bis; et al. Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists 2019. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.0539
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Foliar nutrition with silicon increased the net production value of sugar beet by 5.5-19.0% over the research period.
- Observation The variation in the achieved financial results of sugar beet was large in 2015, under particularly unfavorable conditions.
- Observation The difference in financial results between years was smaller in the more favorable year, 2016.
- Intervention effect The double and triple application of Actisil fertilizer gave the largest increase in gross and net production value of sugar beet.
- Intervention effect The triple application of the Optysil growth stimulator gave the largest increase in gross and net production value of sugar beet.
- Intervention effect A single Optysil growth stimulator application gave the largest profitability indicator, 11.26, for sugar beet.
- Observation The total costs of silicon foliar application of sugar beet varied from 50 to 402 PLN/ha, depending on the number of treatments and the product applied.