Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same treatments increased green gram nitrogen accumulation to 36.6 kg ha−1.

A claim from Multi-nutrient and humic acid foliar applications enhance green gram growth and yield on alkaline soil by increasing nutrient use and physiological activity · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatments increased green gram nitrogen accumulation to 36.6 kg ha−1.

Treatment
water soluble fertilizers 2% and liquid multi-micronutrients 1% with 1% humic acide2
Outcome
nitrogene1
Direction
augmentede1
Value
36.6 kg ha−1e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The same set of treatments augmented leaf area (428 cm2 plant−1), dry matter production (2087 kg ha−1), SPAD value (46.4), nitrogen (36.6 kg ha−1), phosphorous (4.9 kg ha−1), potassium (46.5 kg ha−1), and micronutrients uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1186
e2

“Green gram seed yield increased by 20 per cent on the application of water soluble fertilizers 2% and liquid multi-micronutrients 1% with 1% humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–958

Title

Multi-nutrient and humic acid foliar applications enhance green gram growth and yield on alkaline soil by increasing nutrient use and physiological activity

Kannan Pandian; Kaleeswari Kuttralingam; Vijayakumar Mathiyazhagan; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2024. doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2397417

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-56dbc07bb71aa78d2c03b1859bb37c0abfd475afa35d21036b11f164b53ed533 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.