Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same humic acid treatment enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus content and uptake in greengram seeds and stover.

A claim from Influence of Humic Acid on Yield and Physiological Attributes of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same humic acid treatment enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus content and uptake in greengram seeds and stover.

Treatment
Soil application of 6 kg humic acid ha-1 at the time of sowing and foliar application of 250 ppm humic acid at 30 and 45 days after sowing (DAS)e1
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus content, and uptakee2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
plots that did not receive soil or foliar application of humic acide3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Soil application of 6 kg humic acid ha-1 at the time of sowing and foliar application of 250 ppm humic acid at 30 and 45 days after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–705
e2

“enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus content, and uptake in both seeds and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–935
e3

“plots that did not receive soil or foliar application of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1211
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93

Title

Influence of Humic Acid on Yield and Physiological Attributes of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

Sooryasree P; J. K. Patel; Ankitkumar Chauhan; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2025. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i55480

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-a1664e50cbf2db2ad98aafdc2650f7c27c17b6bb6454a86b74d14ac5496252ad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

sowing time · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.