Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Economic benefits did not significantly differ between urea rates.

A claim from Effects of Nitrogen Management on Garlic Yield, Economic Benefit and Soil Apparent Nutrient Balance · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic benefits did not significantly differ between urea rates.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
urea treatmentse0
Outcome
economic benefitse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
different N application ratese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference both for garlic bulb yield and economic benefits between the urea treatments at different N application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–602
t0

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40
t1

“Garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40

Title

Effects of Nitrogen Management on Garlic Yield, Economic Benefit and Soil Apparent Nutrient Balance

Luji Bo; Yingpeng Zhang; Yan Li; et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE 2016. doi:10.24297/jaa.v6i1.5393

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-5715c388ab62729758282a2e7805b2fb780785f02c01d5051e1ef68ff29506eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 51 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.