Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seedlings at 50% light intensity had higher leaf dry weight (0.25 g) than at 25% light intensity.

A claim from Effect of nutrient sources and light intensities on the seedling vigour of African Star apple (Chrysophyllum albidum G. Don) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings at 50% light intensity had higher leaf dry weight (0.25 g) than at 25% light intensity.

Taxon
Chrysophyllum albidumGambeya albidat0
Treatment
50 % light intensitye2
Outcome
leaf dry weighte2
Direction
highere2
Value
0.25 ge2
Comparator
25 % light intensitye2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gambeya albida
Gambeya albida · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKambai Akau · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“African Star apple (Chrysophyllum albidum G. Don)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–124
e2

“Seedlings planted under 50 % light intensity gave higher value of leaf area (2.71 cm2), root dry weight (0.13 g), leaf dry weight (0.25 g), total dry weight (0.53 g) and relative turgidity (74.82 %) compared to those subjected to 25 % light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1065

Title

Effect of nutrient sources and light intensities on the seedling vigour of African Star apple (Chrysophyllum albidum G. Don)

D.O. Adelani; O. Osunsina; I.O.O. Aiyelaagbe Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment 2020

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-58d384c236f0440d4f5c1ae59037017295b213c98d1aa66b1a228bd697f49144 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

light · growth · Gambeya albidaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.