Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ethephon perfusion did not increase barley spike protein content over distilled water perfusion.

A claim from Field evaluation of the peduncle perfusion technique · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon perfusion did not increase barley spike protein content over distilled water perfusion.

Treatment
Peduncle perfusion with ethephone0
Outcome
spike protein contente0
Direction
not increasede0
Comparator
distilled water perfused plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peduncle perfusion with ethephon increased grain protein concentration, while spike protein content was not increased over distilled water perfused plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1366
e1

“barley grain protein concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–616

Title

Field evaluation of the peduncle perfusion technique

K. Foroutan‐pour; B. L. Ma; D. L. Smith Journal of Plant Nutrition 1995. doi:10.1080/01904169509364974

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-595eae50b2eb0918f2654c28cb0a9f9dd7209b85b68dc1135f0a48f50341c7fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.