Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined AMF and Rhizobium gave higher sorghum grain magnesium content.

A claim from Impact of Row Configuration and Biofertilizers on Yield and Quality of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.) Intercropped with Cowpea in the Southern Laterites of Kerala, India · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined AMF and Rhizobium gave higher sorghum grain magnesium content.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
application of AMF and Rhizobium (b3) togethere0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
magnesium contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of AMF and Rhizobium (b3) together resulted in higher magnesium content in sorghum grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1379

Title

Impact of Row Configuration and Biofertilizers on Yield and Quality of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.) Intercropped with Cowpea in the Southern Laterites of Kerala, India

Kasapogu Rachel Madhurima; Shalini Pillai, P.; Rajasree G.; et al. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology 2024. doi:10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i101586

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-5c39fbbffd4a568bc153c381fa4f5be08311cabbf9fff99642a10addb68cd490 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal sorghum generally had similar shoot mineral contents.

    Effects of Va mycorrhizae on mineral uptake in sorghum genotypes grown on acid soil · 1988 · compared with nonmycorrhizal plants

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    With P, VAM raised total nutrient uptake 2.5 to six fold in sorghum and cowpea.

    Effects of mycorrhizae and phosphorus on growth and nutrient uptake of millet, cowpea and sorghum on a West African soil · 2000

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly raised shoot and root Mo concentrations.

    Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improve the Performance of Sweet Sorghum Grown in a Mo-Contaminated Soil · 2020

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Mycorrhizal plants had higher leaf phosphorus concentration and content than nonmycorrhizal plants regardless of applied phosphorus.

    Mineral uptake and growth of sorghum colonized with VA mycorrhiza at varied soil phosphorus levels · 1990 · compared with nonmycorrhizal plants

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Mycorrhizal colonization significantly increased phosphorus in some sorghum plants.

    Plant Response to Mycorrhizal Fungi: Host, Endophyte, and Soil Effects · 1985 · compared with non‐VAM controls

    Same direction

  6. positive
    The VAM treatment had significant effects on shoot concentrations of P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn and Zn in sorghum.

    Effects of excess aluminum on mineral uptake in mycorrhizal sorghum · 1994

    Same direction

  7. positive
    AMF colonization improved absorption of mineral nutrients including Ca, Mg and P.

    Improved Mineral Acquisition, Sugars Metabolism and Redox Status after Mycorrhizal Inoculation Are the Basis for Tolerance to Vanadium Stress in C3 and C4 Grasses · 2021

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Infected sorghum shoots contained more P, K and Mg than uninfected shoots.

    Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection effects on sorghum growth, phosphorus efficiency, and mineral element uptake · 1987 · compared with uninfected plants

    Same direction

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.