Claim · model-written summary
S. pombe expressing CaMIPS2 grew better under stress than S. pombe expressing CaMIPS1.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- functional expression of CaMIPS2 in S. pombee0
- Gene
- CaMIPS2e0
- Outcome
- growth responsee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- under stress environmente0
- Comparator
- CaMIPS1e0
Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“functional expression of CaMIPS2 in S. pombe results better growth response than CaMIPS1 under stress environment.”
t0“chickpea”
Title
HARMEET KAUR; RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLA; GITANJALI YADAV; et al. Plant Cell & Environment 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01877.x
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation CaMIPS1 and CaMIPS2 diverged in introns while retaining 85% exon identity.
- Observation Both chickpea MIPS genes complemented inositol auxotrophy in S. pombe.
- Observation Both chickpea genes were expressed in all organs except seed.
- Observation Only CaMIPS2 transcript was detected in chickpea seed.
- Intervention effect Environmental stresses induced CaMIPS2.
- Intervention effect CaMIPS1 expression remained unchanged under environmental stresses.
- Mechanism The authors suggested upstream regulatory sequence divergence could explain differential stress expression.
- Observation The two gene products had similar biochemical characteristics.
- Observation CaMIPS2 retained higher activity than CaMIPS1 at high temperature and salt concentration.
- Mechanism The authors inferred that CaMIPS2 likely arose by duplication for environmental stress function.