Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation promoted P, N and S absorption.

A claim from Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improve the Performance of Sweet Sorghum Grown in a Mo-Contaminated Soil · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation promoted P, N and S absorption.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
absorption of P, N and Se0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation promoted the absorption of P, N and S by sweet sorghum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1253
e1

“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1634

Title

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improve the Performance of Sweet Sorghum Grown in a Mo-Contaminated Soil

Zhaoyong Shi; Jiacheng Zhang; Shichuan Lu; et al. Journal of Fungi 2020. doi:10.3390/jof6020044

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-5ea45db2c20831cb2be6dfe825b1f5815de10bdd5206dcd478ff18468fd30361 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal sorghum generally had similar shoot mineral contents.

    Effects of Va mycorrhizae on mineral uptake in sorghum genotypes grown on acid soil · 1988 · compared with nonmycorrhizal plants

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    With P, VAM raised total nutrient uptake 2.5 to six fold in sorghum and cowpea.

    Effects of mycorrhizae and phosphorus on growth and nutrient uptake of millet, cowpea and sorghum on a West African soil · 2000

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Mycorrhizal plants had higher leaf phosphorus concentration and content than nonmycorrhizal plants regardless of applied phosphorus.

    Mineral uptake and growth of sorghum colonized with VA mycorrhiza at varied soil phosphorus levels · 1990 · compared with nonmycorrhizal plants

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Mycorrhizal colonization significantly increased phosphorus in some sorghum plants.

    Plant Response to Mycorrhizal Fungi: Host, Endophyte, and Soil Effects · 1985 · compared with non‐VAM controls

    Same direction

  5. positive
    The VAM treatment had significant effects on shoot concentrations of P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn and Zn in sorghum.

    Effects of excess aluminum on mineral uptake in mycorrhizal sorghum · 1994

    Same direction

  6. positive
    AMF colonization improved absorption of mineral nutrients including Ca, Mg and P.

    Improved Mineral Acquisition, Sugars Metabolism and Redox Status after Mycorrhizal Inoculation Are the Basis for Tolerance to Vanadium Stress in C3 and C4 Grasses · 2021

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Infected sorghum shoots contained more P, K and Mg than uninfected shoots.

    Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection effects on sorghum growth, phosphorus efficiency, and mineral element uptake · 1987 · compared with uninfected plants

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Mycorrhizal sorghum generally had higher mineral nutrient concentrations and contents than nonmycorrhizal sorghum.

    Effects of excess manganese on mineral uptake in mycorrhizal sorghum · 1995 · compared with nonmycorrhizal

    Same direction

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Inoculated sorghum had about 60% lower Fe uptake than axenic plants.

    Competition between micro‐organisms and roots of barley and sorghum for iron accumulated in the root apoplasm · 1995 · compared with axenic plants

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Shoot and root N concentrations remained fairly steady in sorghum inoculated with strain Cd.

    Development and growth effects in the Sorghum–Azospirillum association · 1990

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Bradyrhizobium inoculation did not enhance most mineral contents of sorghum in either cropping system.

    Intercropping Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.): Effect of Bradyrhizobium Inoculation and Fertilization on Minerals Composition of Sorghum Seeds · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Bacterial inoculation had no positive effect on sorghum P uptake by straw or root.

    Effect of Bio-Organic Additives and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates on Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Uptake by Sorghum with Aid of 15N Stable Isotope · 2017

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    A. scrobiculata inoculation gave sorghum the greatest total nitrogen uptake in shoots.

    Comparative potentials of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve nutrient uptake and biomass of Sorghum bicolor Linn · 2016

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Root zinc uptake fell by 45% under the phytoremediation treatment.

    Streptomyces pactum assisted phytoremediation in Zn/Pb smelter contaminated soil of Feng County and its impact on enzymatic activities · 2017

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The sorghum integrated fertilizer and chickpea 100% RDF sequence had higher nutrient balance.

    Integrated nutrient management in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)–chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cropping sequence under irrigated conditions · 2006

    Same direction

  8. positive
    AMF inoculation increased copper in sorghum by 208% over uninoculated crops.

    Response of Different Crops to Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungal Inoculation in Phosphorus-Deficient Soil · 2011 · compared with uninoculated crops

    Same direction

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.