Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Formulation C at both rates had higher weed-control efficiency.

A claim from Evaluating the effect of controlled-release atrazine formulations on weed suppression, crop growth and yield in Maize (Zea Mays L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formulation C at both rates had higher weed-control efficiency.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine formulations (C) at both ratese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine formulations (C) at both rates exhibited higher weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–888
t0

“Maize (Zea Mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–131

Title

Evaluating the effect of controlled-release atrazine formulations on weed suppression, crop growth and yield in Maize (Zea Mays L.)

J Prasanna; S Marimuthu; G Gowtham; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.7542

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-5ee1a115eaceefec8728d113ffa9ea85fee9b6dc251b9ea8bbef2fb9978362da · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

193 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.