Claim · model-written summary
Formulation C at both rates had higher weed-control efficiency.
- Treatment
- atrazine formulations (C) at both ratese0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“atrazine formulations (C) at both rates exhibited higher weed control efficiency”
t0“Maize (Zea Mays L.)”
Title
J Prasanna; S Marimuthu; G Gowtham; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.7542
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Formulation C at 1.5 kg a.i. ha-1 gave higher growth parameters.
- Intervention effect Formulation C at 1.5 kg a.i. ha-1 gave higher yield parameters.
- Intervention effect Formulation C at 1.5 kg a.i. ha-1 produced 6444 kg ha-1 grain yield, higher among herbicide treatments.
- Intervention effect Formulation C at 1.5 kg a.i. ha-1 produced 14397 kg ha-1 stover yield, higher among herbicide treatments.
- Intervention effect Commercial atrazine gave lower weed-control efficiency.
- Intervention effect Commercial atrazine gave lower maize growth.
- Intervention effect Commercial atrazine gave lower maize yield.