Intervention effectmodel-written summary

BARI mung 6 under foliar GA3 at 100 ppm had better plant height (56.59cm).

A claim from Effect of foliar application of gibberellic acid on different growth contributing characters of mungbean · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI mung 6 under foliar GA3 at 100 ppm had better plant height (56.59cm).

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Material
BARI mung 6e0
Treatment
GA3 @ 100 ppme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
bettere0
Value
56.59cme0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that application of GA3 @ 100 ppm produced better performance on morpho-physiological characters namely, plant height (56.59cm), number of leaves per plant (10.75), branches per plant (4.75), length of root (24.73cm), total dry matter weight (12.67g)which were recorded from the variety BARI mung 6 with the foliar application of GA3 @ 100 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–832
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104

Title

Effect of foliar application of gibberellic acid on different growth contributing characters of mungbean

MM Rahman; ABMMM Khan; MM Hasan; et al. Progressive Agriculture 2018. doi:10.3329/pa.v29i3.40008

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-5efca8f5ab3d2a144587ef0de7ab5a003427ed5b3552bdfd410808e2abf75017 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.