Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined soil and foliage application increased CC-25-9-N yield by 2.15 t ha-1.

A claim from Effect of different application forms of efficient microorganisms on the agricultural productive of two bean cultivars · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliage application increased CC-25-9-N yield by 2.15 t ha-1.

Taxon
beant0
Material
CC-25-9-Ne0
Treatment
associated applications between the inoculation of the soil and foliage applications of efficient microorganismse0
Interactor
efficient microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
2.15 t ha-1e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“The associated applications between the inoculation of the soil and foliage applications of efficient microorganisms provided better results, producing increments in the yield of 1.13 t ha-1 in VL and 2.15 t ha-1 in CC-25-9-N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1347
t0

“two bean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118

Title

Effect of different application forms of efficient microorganisms on the agricultural productive of two bean cultivars

Alexander Calero Hurtado; Yanery Pérez Díaz; Dilier Olivera Viciedo; et al. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín 2019. doi:10.15446/rfnam.v72n3.76272

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-5fa2e90661c35d76871f3d1a16d648ee9d04b3bc9af6d28715b100ef42a501e7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Combined treatment increased early-season yield by about 102% over absolute control.

    Association between AzoFert® and efficient microorganism potentiates the growth and productivity of beans · 2020 · compared with absolute control

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Coinoculation increased green bean productivity by 138%.

    Coinoculación de biofertilizantes microbianos en pepino y habichuela y su efecto en el crecimiento y rendimiento · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    Inoculated treatments yielded significantly less than the control.

    Effects of Angular Leaf Spot and Rust on Yield Loss of Phaseolus vulgaris · 2001 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    LCS0306 inoculation gave grain yield similar to nitrogen-fertilised controls.

    Formulation of a Highly Effective Inoculant for Common Bean Based on an Autochthonous Elite Strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli, and Genomic-Based Insights Into Its Agronomic Performance · 2019 · compared with nitrogen-fertilised controls

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Under BGYMV inoculation, PR9556-158 had fewer seeds per pod than PR9556-171.

    Inheritance of Normal Pod Development in Bean Golden Yellow Mosaic Resistant Common Bean · 2004 · compared with PR9556-171

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Rhizobia inoculation did not significantly increase seed yields or reduce the response to N fertilizer.

    Fertilizer responses of dry bean in southern Alberta · 2001

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation under full N did not raise biomass or pod yield.

    Impact of rhizobial inoculation and reduced N supply on biomass production and biological N2 fixation in common bean grown hydroponically · 2017 · compared with non‐inoculation

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.

    Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina · 2020

    Opposite direction

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.