Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Iron foliar spray increased grain dry weight by 13.3% versus check.

A claim from Effect of irrigation and micronutrient foliar application on quality and quantity parameters of soybean · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron foliar spray increased grain dry weight by 13.3% versus check.

Treatment
Fe foliar applicatione7
Outcome
grain dry weighte7
Direction
increasede7
Value
13.3%e7
Comparator
M0 (Check treatment)e7

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e7

“Fe foliar application increased grain dry weight up to 13.3% compared M0 (Check treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1197

Title

Effect of irrigation and micronutrient foliar application on quality and quantity parameters of soybean

Soheil Kobraee; Keyvan Shamsi; Mohammad Saeed Vaghar Current biotica 2014

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5fc4e0b16678232f3e0e034e787247e2280288c9d065f1295eba2064625bfdf4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

iron atom · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

40 papers: 29 positive, 11 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Iron deficiency decreased soybean root and shoot growth.

    Iron deficiency differently affects metabolic responses in soybean roots · 2007

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. negative
    High iron suppressed somatic tissue growth.

    Callus and Plantlet Regeneration from Cell Cultures of Ladino Clover and Soybean · 1977

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    There was no evidence that higher rates of Fe reduced soybean growth.

    Soybean Growth on Calcareous Soil as Affected by Three Iron Sources · 2003

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Iron-bound P reduced soybean growth by 35.4% ± 6.7% relative to KH2PO4.

    Phosphorus Fractions of Red Soils in Guangdong Province of South China and Their Bioavailability for Five Crop Species · 2014 · compared with KH2PO4

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    The lowest Fe level depressed soybean growth.

    Evaluation of catalase and peroxidase activity as indicators of Fe and Mn nutrition for soybean · 1986

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Iron limitation reduced soybean growth about 10 per cent in a pot test despite no chlorosis.

    Definition of stresses in crop production—iron, plant nutrient, and non-nutrient stress interactions · 1986

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Iron deficiency increased soybean root volume, surface area and tip count.

    Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Impacts of Available-Iron Levels on the Accumulation and Translocation of 6:2 Chlorinated Polyfluoroalkyl Ether Sulfonate in Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) · 2025

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  8. no effect
    Seed viability under iron at pH 6–7 did not differ significantly from control.

    Effect of Iron (Fe) heavy metal content at different pH on the germination of seven soybean varieties in Indonesia · 2023 · compared with control media

    Opposite direction

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 171 positive, 36 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Leaf soaking with SA did not negatively affect seedling development.

    Effects of Salicylic Acid on the Development and Root Nodulation of Soybean Seedlings · 2000

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Pod development in soybeans is not impaired by foliar auxin plus cytokinin treatment

    Prevention of Monocarpic Senescence in Soybeans with Auxin and Cytokinin: An Antidote for Self-Destruction · 1979

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar activator did not increase growth.

    An inducible activator produced by a Serratia proteamaculans strain and its soybean growth-promoting activity under greenhouse conditions · 2002

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    A 25 mM BABA root drench had minimal adverse impact on soybean growth.

    DL-β-Aminobutyric Acid-Induced Resistance in Soybean against Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae) · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    As the spray volume was reduced, a progressively larger amount of growth-inhibiting substance was required to kill young soybean plants.

    Quantitative Aspects of Aqueous-Spray Applications of 2,4- Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid for Herbicidal Purposes · 1946

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Inner tunica cells initiated leaves and stipules; gibberellic acid did not significantly alter this process.

    EFFECTS OF GIBBERELLIC ACID ON THE ANATOMY OF SOYBEANS (GLYCINE MAX) · 1964

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Activator sprayed onto the leaves did not increase soybean growth.

    An inducible activator produced by a Serratia proteamaculans strain and its soybean growth‐promoting activity under greenhouse conditions · 2002

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Early foliar nitrogen following PGR injury reduced soybean biomass by up to 25%.

    Nitrogen application after plant growth regulator herbicide drift reduces soybean growth and yield · 2019

    Opposite direction

198 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.