Claim · model-written summary
Rice yield under 80% CRU plus ZNC did not differ significantly from 100% CRU.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- 80% CRU and ZNCe0
- Outcome
- rice yielde0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- 100% CRUe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combination of 80% CRU and ZNC showed no significant difference in rice yield from treatment with 100% CRU”
Title
Xiaoqi Wang; Yuanyuan Yao; Zhiguang Liu; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1002/jsfa.11525
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect CRU improved rice grain yield over conventional urea at the same nitrogen level.
- Intervention effect CRU improved NUE over conventional urea at the same nitrogen level.
- Intervention effect Reducing CRU nitrogen by 40% still gave higher rice yield than full conventional urea.
- Intervention effect Reducing CRU nitrogen by 40% gave higher net profit than full conventional urea.
- Intervention effect ZNC increased rice panicle number.
- Intervention effect ZNC increased nitrogen accumulation in rice.
- Intervention effect ZNC increased rice yield.
- Intervention effect ZNC enriched CRU increased rice grain yield by 9.2% in one year.
- Intervention effect ZNC enriched CRU increased rice grain yield by 8.7% in the other year.
- Intervention effect ZNC increased rice NUE and N partial factor productivity.
- Intervention effect ZNC increased net profit.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that combining CRU and ZNC can reduce nitrogen input while maintaining yield.