Paper · 2021 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Highly active biostimulant Paecilomyces variotii extracts reduced controlled‐release urea application while maintaining rice yield

Xiaoqi Wang; Yuanyuan Yao; Zhiguang Liu; et al.

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The high cost of controlled‐release urea (CRU) has prompted this study to explore whether the amount of CRU can be reduced by adding biostimulants while maintaining or increasing rice yield. A 2 year field experiment was conducted with CRU at three levels (60%, 80%, and 100% of the recommended nitrogen (N) fertilizer) and a novel biostimulant Paecilomyces variotii extract (ZNC), to investigate their synergistic effects on yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and net profitability of rice. RESULTS Controlled‐release urea achieved a significantly higher gain yield and NUE than conventional urea with the same N level, which could be attributed to its N supply. Even if the N level of CRU was reduced by 40%, both rice yield and net profit were still significantly higher than for the full amount of urea. Paecilomyces variotii extract sprayed on the surface of CRU at a dose of only 87.5 mL ha −1 exhibited ultra‐high effectiveness by increasing the panicles, the N accumulation, and the rice yield. Controlled‐release urea enriched by ZNC achieved significantly higher gain yield than CRU alone, increasing the yield by 9.2% and 8.7%, respectively, in 2 years under the full recommended N rate. The combination of 80% CRU and ZNC showed no significant difference in rice yield from treatment with 100% CRU, indicating that the rate of CRU could be reduced by ZNC. The application of ZNC further increased NUE, N partial factor productivity, and net profit. CONCLUSION The CRU and ZNC combination provided a feasible approach for reducing N input while maintaining rice yield and agricultural sustainability. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU improved rice grain yield over conventional urea at the same nitrogen level.

Treatment
Controlled‐release ureae0
Outcome
gain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Controlled‐release urea achieved a significantly higher gain yield and NUE than conventional urea with the same N level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRU improved NUE over conventional urea at the same nitrogen level.

Treatment
Controlled‐release ureae0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Controlled‐release urea achieved a significantly higher gain yield and NUE than conventional urea with the same N level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing CRU nitrogen by 40% still gave higher rice yield than full conventional urea.

Treatment
CRUe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
the full amount of ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even if the N level of CRU was reduced by 40%, both rice yield and net profit were still significantly higher than for the full amount of urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing CRU nitrogen by 40% gave higher net profit than full conventional urea.

Treatment
CRUe0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
highere0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
the full amount of ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even if the N level of CRU was reduced by 40%, both rice yield and net profit were still significantly higher than for the full amount of urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZNC increased rice panicle number.

Treatment
Paecilomyces variotii extract sprayed on the surface of CRU at a dose of only 87.5 mL ha −1e0
Outcome
paniclese0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paecilomyces variotii extract sprayed on the surface of CRU at a dose of only 87.5 mL ha −1 exhibited ultra‐high effectiveness by increasing the panicles, the N accumulation, and the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZNC increased nitrogen accumulation in rice.

Treatment
Paecilomyces variotii extract sprayed on the surface of CRU at a dose of only 87.5 mL ha −1e0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paecilomyces variotii extract sprayed on the surface of CRU at a dose of only 87.5 mL ha −1 exhibited ultra‐high effectiveness by increasing the panicles, the N accumulation, and the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZNC increased rice yield.

Treatment
Paecilomyces variotii extract sprayed on the surface of CRU at a dose of only 87.5 mL ha −1e0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paecilomyces variotii extract sprayed on the surface of CRU at a dose of only 87.5 mL ha −1 exhibited ultra‐high effectiveness by increasing the panicles, the N accumulation, and the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZNC enriched CRU increased rice grain yield by 9.2% in one year.

Treatment
Controlled‐release urea enriched by ZNCe0
Outcome
gain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.2%e0
Comparator
CRU alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Controlled‐release urea enriched by ZNC achieved significantly higher gain yield than CRU alone, increasing the yield by 9.2% and 8.7%, respectively, in 2 years under the full recommended N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZNC enriched CRU increased rice grain yield by 8.7% in the other year.

Treatment
Controlled‐release urea enriched by ZNCe0
Outcome
gain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.7%e0
Comparator
CRU alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Controlled‐release urea enriched by ZNC achieved significantly higher gain yield than CRU alone, increasing the yield by 9.2% and 8.7%, respectively, in 2 years under the full recommended N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield under 80% CRU plus ZNC did not differ significantly from 100% CRU.

Treatment
80% CRU and ZNCe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
100% CRUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of 80% CRU and ZNC showed no significant difference in rice yield from treatment with 100% CRU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZNC increased rice NUE and N partial factor productivity.

Treatment
ZNCe0
Outcome
NUE, N partial factor productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of ZNC further increased NUE, N partial factor productivity, and net profit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZNC increased net profit.

Treatment
ZNCe0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of ZNC further increased NUE, N partial factor productivity, and net profit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that combining CRU and ZNC can reduce nitrogen input while maintaining yield.

Outcome
reducing N input while maintaining rice yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CRU and ZNC combination provided a feasible approach for reducing N input while maintaining rice yield and agricultural sustainability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1633 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

208 papers: 193 positive, 15 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

204 papers more in this group

See all 208 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 212 positive, 10 negative or no effect

211 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.