Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water deficit reduced spikes per area by an average 24%.

A claim from NITROGEN NUTRITION AND WATER STRESS EFFECTS ON GROWTH, YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced spikes per area by an average 24%.

Treatment
maximum irrigation deficit (one irrigation)e0
Outcome
spikes m· 2e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both years, the average reduction in spikes m· 2 at maximum irrigation deficit (one irrigation) at all N levels was 24%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1648
t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117

Title

NITROGEN NUTRITION AND WATER STRESS EFFECTS ON GROWTH, YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)

Riaz Ahmad; M. Sabir 2007

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-61cb89722e0abc156037fc559b8a8f25e5006355b5716d0ca65c36ff76962707 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

191 papers in the same direction as this claim · 797 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.