Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Alternating the two products for transplant dipping or foliar spray raised rice yield by about 32% over single-organism use.

A claim from Applying beneficial microbes as transplanting dipping and post-transplanting foliar spray led to improved rice productivity · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating the two products for transplant dipping or foliar spray raised rice yield by about 32% over single-organism use.

Treatment
alternative use of B. subtilis and T. asperellum as transplant dipping or post-transplanting foliar spraye0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0symbiont
Second interactor
T. asperellumTrichoderma asperellume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
ca. 32%e0
Comparator
single-organism productse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · Second interactorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alternative use of B. subtilis and T. asperellum as transplant dipping or post-transplanting foliar spray led to further yield increase (ca. 32%) over the use of single-organism products at both times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–923
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–110

Title

Applying beneficial microbes as transplanting dipping and post-transplanting foliar spray led to improved rice productivity

Ruth Murunde; Gideon Ringo; Louisa Robinson-Boyer; et al. Technology in Agronomy 2023. doi:10.48130/tia-2023-0007

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-64d4ec77b281faeb2b3c919a0bc84458edcdeda62f7acd1964eb821161cda197 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Trichoderma asperellum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this claim · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

682 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.