Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Effective Biocontrol of Rice Blast through Dipping Transplants and Foliar Applications

Ruth Murunde; Gideon Ringo; Louisa Robinson-Boyer; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa) is an increasingly popular food in Africa. As much as 30% of yields are lost due to blast disease caused by Magnaporthe oryzae. Several commercial biopesticides of Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma asperellum, and Serratia sp. strains were evaluated under field conditions for their effects against rice blast and yield at one site in Kenya and three sites in Tanzania in 2020 and 2021. Each biopesticide was applied as a dipping treatment at transplanting, post-transplanting foliar spraying, or both. Using biopesticides not only achieved blast control but also increased grain yield, particularly in low-production regions in Tanzania, with a yield increase of >100%. For higher-production sites with low disease pressure, the yield increase through biopesticides over the untreated control was limited, although significant disease suppression was achieved. Dipping alone was sufficient to suppress disease and improve yield unless disease pressure was high. The differences among the three biopesticides varied with site/year but generally were small. Improved yield using biopesticides is unlikely to result solely from reduced blast development, but also from improved plant development. The present study suggests that these commercial biopesticides should be applied in rice production, particularly in subsistence farming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticides controlled rice blast.

Treatment
biopesticidese0
Interactor
Magnaporthe oryzaePyricularia oryzaee1pathogen
Outcome
blast controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyricularia oryzae
Pyricularia oryzae · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using biopesticides not only achieved blast control but also increased grain yield, particularly in low-production regions in Tanzania, with a yield increase of >100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“blast disease caused by Magnaporthe oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticides increased rice grain yield by more than 100% in low-production regions of Tanzania.

Treatment
biopesticidese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
>100%e0
Setting
Tanzaniae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using biopesticides not only achieved blast control but also increased grain yield, particularly in low-production regions in Tanzania, with a yield increase of >100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher-production sites with low disease pressure, biopesticide yield gains over untreated control were limited.

Treatment
biopesticidese0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
limitede0
Qualifier
higher-production sites with low disease pressuree0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For higher-production sites with low disease pressure, the yield increase through biopesticides over the untreated control was limited, although significant disease suppression was achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher-production sites with low disease pressure, biopesticides significantly suppressed blast disease.

Treatment
biopesticidese0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
suppressione0
Qualifier
higher-production sites with low disease pressuree0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For higher-production sites with low disease pressure, the yield increase through biopesticides over the untreated control was limited, although significant disease suppression was achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping alone suppressed rice blast except where disease pressure was high.

Treatment
Dipping alonee0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
suppresse0
Qualifier
unless disease pressure was highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping alone was sufficient to suppress disease and improve yield unless disease pressure was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping alone improved rice yield except where disease pressure was high.

Treatment
Dipping alonee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
unless disease pressure was highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping alone was sufficient to suppress disease and improve yield unless disease pressure was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences among three biopesticides varied by site and year but were generally small.

Outcome
differences among the three biopesticidese0
Qualifier
varied with site/year but generally were smalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences among the three biopesticides varied with site/year but generally were small.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest biopesticide yield gains also result from improved plant development.

Treatment
biopesticidese0
Outcome
Improved yielde0
Qualifier
improved plant developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improved yield using biopesticides is unlikely to result solely from reduced blast development, but also from improved plant development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend commercial biopesticides in rice production, particularly subsistence farming.

Outcome
biopesticides should be applied in rice productione0
Qualifier
particularly in subsistence farminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present study suggests that these commercial biopesticides should be applied in rice production, particularly in subsistence farming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1349 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

biocontrol · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · Pyricularia oryzae · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.