Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azofoska supplementation produced the highest Parabola yield.

A claim from Crop yield and micronutrient contents (Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) in spring wheat grain depending on the fertilization method · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azofoska supplementation produced the highest Parabola yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Parabolae1
Treatment
supplementing the basic fertilization with Azofoska fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
basic fertilizatione0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield was obtained by supplementing the basic fertilization with Azofoska fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–861
e1

“grain yield for Parabola cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–759
e2

“in spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79

Title

Crop yield and micronutrient contents (Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) in spring wheat grain depending on the fertilization method

Katarzyna WOJTKOWIAK; M. Warechowska; Arkadiusz STĘPIEŃ; et al. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2017. doi:10.5513/jcea01/18.1.1872

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-6c3b3473fc2ea43504eee0f38c2f4ae2b1119ea8ebb83230cb00324d1db1a6e2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.