Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drought stress significantly decreased CO 2 assimilation rate (A) in all chickpea genotypes.

A claim from Drought Stress Effects on Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Water Relations in Tolerant and Susceptible Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Genotypes · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly decreased CO 2 assimilation rate (A) in all chickpea genotypes.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilation rate (A)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly decreased shoot dry weight, CO 2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), and PSII photochemical efficiency (F v /F m ) in all genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–739
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–154
e1

“control (100% field capacity) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–378

Title

Drought Stress Effects on Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Water Relations in Tolerant and Susceptible Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Genotypes

Raheleh Rahbarian; Ramazanali Khavari-Nejad; Ali Ganjeali; et al. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s Botanica 2011. doi:10.2478/v10182-011-0007-2

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-6cf99ec8d7d2cee73dc64dc0a2815285b3d55a1d8e0b6fb20c8761ec7f1cdd02 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.