Paper · 2020 · Molecules

Role of Ascorbic acid, Glutathione and Proline Applied as Singly or in Sequence Combination in Improving Chickpea Plant through Physiological Change and Antioxidant Defense under Different Levels of Irrigation Intervals

Hossam S. El-Beltagi; Heba I. Mohamed; Mahmoud R. Sofy

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
165
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In recent years, the harmful effects of drought stress have been be mitigated by using bioactive compounds such as antioxidants and osmolytes. In this research, pot experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of ascorbic acid, glutathione and proline on alleviating the harmful effect of drought stress in chickpea plants during season 2017. Chickpea plant seeds were soaked in ascorbic acid (0.75 mM), glutathione (0.75 mM), proline (0.75 mM) singly and/or in sequence combinations for 4 h and then planted in pots. The pots were irrigated with water after seven days (to serve as control), after 14 days (moderate drought stress) and after 28 days (severe drought stress). The sequence combination of antioxidants and proline under drought stress has not been studied yet. The results showed significantly decreased in plant growth, yielding characteristics, photosynthetic pigments and soluble protein content in response to moderate and severe drought stress. Moreover, treatment with antioxidants caused increment the antioxidant enzyme activity, non-enzymatic antioxidant (ascorbic acid and glutathione) contents and endogenous proline in stressed and unstressed plants. In conclusion, The sequence combination of antioxidants and proline caused improvement in plant growth under drought stress by up-regulating the antioxidant defense system and osmolyte synthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate and severe drought significantly reduced chickpea growth and yield characteristics.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
moderate and severe drought stresse0
Outcome
plant growth, yielding characteristicse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed significantly decreased in plant growth, yielding characteristics, photosynthetic pigments and soluble protein content in response to moderate and severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate and severe drought significantly reduced photosynthetic pigments and soluble protein content.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
moderate and severe drought stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments and soluble protein contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed significantly decreased in plant growth, yielding characteristics, photosynthetic pigments and soluble protein content in response to moderate and severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant treatment increased antioxidant enzyme activity in stressed and unstressed chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
antioxidantse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Direction
incremente0
Qualifier
stressed and unstressed plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with antioxidants caused increment the antioxidant enzyme activity, non-enzymatic antioxidant (ascorbic acid and glutathione) contents and endogenous proline in stressed and unstressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant treatment increased non-enzymatic antioxidant contents and endogenous proline in stressed and unstressed chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
antioxidantse0
Outcome
non-enzymatic antioxidant (ascorbic acid and glutathione) contents and endogenous prolinee0
Direction
incremente0
Qualifier
stressed and unstressed plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with antioxidants caused increment the antioxidant enzyme activity, non-enzymatic antioxidant (ascorbic acid and glutathione) contents and endogenous proline in stressed and unstressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential antioxidants and proline improved chickpea growth under drought stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
sequence combination of antioxidants and prolinee0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sequence combination of antioxidants and proline caused improvement in plant growth under drought stress by up-regulating the antioxidant defense system and osmolyte synthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute improved chickpea growth to up-regulated antioxidant defense and osmolyte synthesis.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
sequence combination of antioxidants and prolinee0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Qualifier
up-regulating the antioxidant defense system and osmolyte synthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sequence combination of antioxidants and proline caused improvement in plant growth under drought stress by up-regulating the antioxidant defense system and osmolyte synthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–119 · show in text ↑

proline · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.