Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Strip-till produced higher corn grain yield than traditional dump soil treatment.

A claim from FORMATION OF THE ROOT CORN SYSTEM FOR GRAIN WITH VARIOUS SOIL PROCESSING SYSTEMS IN THE CENTRAL CAUCASUS ZONE · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip-till produced higher corn grain yield than traditional dump soil treatment.

Treatment
Strip-till tillage systeme0
Outcome
yield of corn for graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
traditional dump soil treatment systeme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The advantage of the Strip-till tillage system, which forms the best water regime in the spring period of plant vegetation and, accordingly, more intensive development of the root system, has ensured a higher yield of corn for grain in comparison with the traditional dump soil treatment system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–543

Title

FORMATION OF THE ROOT CORN SYSTEM FOR GRAIN WITH VARIOUS SOIL PROCESSING SYSTEMS IN THE CENTRAL CAUCASUS ZONE

PROCEEDINGS of Nizhnevolzhskiy agrouniversity complex science and higher vocational education 2020. doi:10.32786/2071-9485-2020-01-07

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-6eb01374037c4e6ab81a58ff2c10294b583a2718107945dec9caf236de93b394 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    At Novelty strip till deep band increased yield by 1.57 Mg per hectare.

    Utility of Phosphorus Enhancers and Strip-Tillage for Corn Production · 2013 · compared with NT-BC

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Cover-crop no-tillage and standard no-tillage gave similar corn yields.

    Potential Long‐Term Benefits of No‐Tillage and Organic Cropping Systems for Grain Production and Soil Improvement · 2007 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    No-till produced less corn grain than plow tillage.

    Tillage and Rotation Interactions for Corn and Soybean Grain Yield as Affected by Precipitation and Air Temperature · 2004 · compared with plow

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Tillage had no grain-yield effect in manure or compost plots in three of four years.

    Composted and Noncomposted Manure Application to Conventional and No‐Tillage Systems: Corn Yield and Nitrogen Uptake · 1999

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    No-tillage corn grain yield was 5% lower than under conventional tillage.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003 · compared with conventional tillage system

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Continuous no-till corn on Chalmers soil was 2% wetter at harvest than plowed corn.

    Long‐Term Tillage and Rotation Effects on Corn Growth and Yield on High and Low Organic Matter, Poorly Drained Soils · 1988 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    No-tillage without red clover reduced corn grain yield by 13% versus conventional tillage over three years.

    Red Clover and Tillage Influence on Soil Temperature, Water Content, and Corn Emergence · 1999 · compared with conventional tillage treatment

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    A significant tillage x year interaction indicated equal continuous corn yields for CT and NT in the first 2 years.

    Corn Production as Affected by Tillage System and Starter Fertilizer · 2002 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.