Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation had the largest impact on maize root and shoot growth and crop yield compared with rainfed maize.

A claim from Maize root development and grain production as affected by soil and water management on a sandy soil in a semi-arid region of southern Mozambique · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation had the largest impact on maize root and shoot growth and crop yield compared with rainfed maize.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
Irrigatione5
Outcome
root and shoot growth and crop yielde5
Direction
largest impacte5
Comparator
rainfede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mozambique is low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57
e1

“examined the impact of three tillage methods (hand hoeing, strip tillage and conventional tillage), two fertiliser levels (0 and 40% N) and two water supply regimes (rainfed and irrigated)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–449
e5

“Irrigation had the largest impact on root and shoot growth and crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–974

Title

Maize root development and grain production as affected by soil and water management on a sandy soil in a semi-arid region of southern Mozambique

Emílio Magaia; Johan Arvidsson; Rui Brito; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2015. doi:10.1080/09064710.2015.1090624

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-6f6c00ddf5f4dfd844f9f69e607b629d0fd3fff6069742e483ff6930bf2b6b98 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this claim · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,007 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.