Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Most Pinus species showed no seedling growth response to ectomycorrhizal inoculation until 6 months old.

A claim from Invasive trees rely more on mycorrhizas, countering the ideal‐weed hypothesis · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most Pinus species showed no seedling growth response to ectomycorrhizal inoculation until 6 months old.

Taxon
PinusPinuse1
Treatment
ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculatione1
Interactor
ectomycorrhizal fungale1symbiont
Outcome
seedling growth responsee1
Direction
no responsee2
Qualifier
until they were 6 mo olde2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“comparing the seedling growth response of different Pinus species (varying in invasiveness) to ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–412
e2

“Most species showed no response until they were 6 mo old”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–470

Title

Invasive trees rely more on mycorrhizas, countering the ideal‐weed hypothesis

Jaime Moyano; Mariano A. Rodriguez‐Cabal; Martin A. Nuñez Ecology 2021. doi:10.1002/ecy.3330

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-705a64d20232a89783a35c3332168087f5914d10d0b365eec49ce52d77e97704 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · growth · PinusPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Pine seedlings in prairie soil failed to grow normally unless supplied with mycorrhizal fungi.

    The Role of Mycorrhizae in Afforestation · 1936 · compared with except when artificially provided with mycorrhizal fungi

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

inoculation · growth · PinusPositive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.