Intervention effectmodel-written summary

120 cm spacing gave higher protein percentage in the second season.

A claim from EFFECT OF FURROW SPACING AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION TREATMENTS ON FABA BEAN YIELD, NUTRIENTS CONTENT AND SOME WATER RELATIONSHIPS · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

120 cm spacing gave higher protein percentage in the second season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae7
Treatment
120 cm furrow spacinge0
Outcome
protein %e0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.34%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting method of 120 cm furrow spacing had the higher protein % mean value in the second season (22.34%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1659
e7

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–228

Title

EFFECT OF FURROW SPACING AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION TREATMENTS ON FABA BEAN YIELD, NUTRIENTS CONTENT AND SOME WATER RELATIONSHIPS

A. S. M. El-Saady; Gh. Sh. El-Atawy; R. H. Atia Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2011. doi:10.21608/jssae.2011.55630

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-708fb4e6bf1ad2d83fe9bb623d54914c830f60012f0fa40ecbe11d21bc9b348d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

density · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.