Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Buthidazole had less effect on photosynthesis of corn than on the sensitive weeds.

A claim from Physiological effects of buthidazole on Zea mays L., Amaratithus retroflexus L., Medicago sativa L. and Agropyron repens(L.) Beauv.* · 1979

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buthidazole had less effect on photosynthesis of corn than on the sensitive weeds.

Treatment
buthidazolee0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
less effecte1
Comparator
sensitive redroot pigweed and quackgrass plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggested that buthidazole was a rapid inhibitor of photosynthesis of the sensitive redroot pigweed and quackgrass plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–994
e1

“with less effect on corn and alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1032

Title

Physiological effects of buthidazole on Zea mays L., Amaratithus retroflexus L., Medicago sativa L. and Agropyron repens(L.) Beauv.*

KRITON K. HATZIOS; DONALD PENNER Weed Research 1979. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1979.tb01553.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-71baa883145e3652f6aa39a2d1f8981ea30d394e9f64ee46bb06c473b84e0920 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Buthidazole · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.