Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shading and Si 0.15% increased macronutrient content of pomegranate arils.

A claim from Fruit quality, antioxidant, and mineral attributes of pomegranate cv. Ghojagh, influenced by shading and spray applications of potassium sulfate and sodium silicate · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading and Si 0.15% increased macronutrient content of pomegranate arils.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
cv. Ghojaght0
Organ / stage
arilse6
Treatment
Shading as well as Si 0.15%e6
Outcome
macronutrients contente6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cv. Ghojagh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–77
e6

“Shading as well as Si 0.15% increased macronutrients content of the arils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1458

Title

Fruit quality, antioxidant, and mineral attributes of pomegranate cv. Ghojagh, influenced by shading and spray applications of potassium sulfate and sodium silicate

Samira Moradi; Zabihollah Zamani; Reza Fatahi; et al. Scientific Reports 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65084-3

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-72ced18e4848c2de07a71205a9062239668b36c359c6be2eb1b0eef605a3466a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

shade · nutrient: content · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.