Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage gave higher chickpea grain yield than reduced tillage in both seasons.

A claim from Effects of Different Tillage Systems and Soil Residual Nitrogen on Chickpea Yield and Yield Components in Rotation with Wheat under Dry Farming Areas · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave higher chickpea grain yield than reduced tillage in both seasons.

Treatment
conventional tillage (CT)e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
both of the growing seasonse0
Comparator
reduced tillage (RT)e0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was higher under conventional tillage (CT) than reduced tillage (RT) in both of the growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–806

Title

Effects of Different Tillage Systems and Soil Residual Nitrogen on Chickpea Yield and Yield Components in Rotation with Wheat under Dry Farming Areas

Nihal Kayan; Imren Kutlu; Nazife Gozde Ayter; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2017. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.0325

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-76f479eea06fecfefb7168b176849a30e254f3b05b6a55572f2bc89e365e1b54 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Tillage had no significant effect on chickpea grain yield.

    Evaluation of the Productive Potential of a World Collection of Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for the Initiation of Breeding Programs for Adaptation to Conservation Agriculture · 2023

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    No-tillage reduced plant productivity except for weeds, especially in garbanzo.

    Soil Food Webs and Carbon Dynamics in Response to Conservation Tillage in California · 2007 · compared with standard tillage + continuous cropping

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    The two no-till systems averaged 2100 kg ha-1 chickpea seed yield, 83% of the yield in the tilled-fallow system.

    Seed Yield and Yield Stability of Chickpea in Response to Cropping Systems and Soil Fertility in Northern Latitudes · 2009 · compared with tilled‐fallow system

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Tillage practices did not influence chickpea seed yield in either year.

    Impact of conservation practices on crop water use and productivity in chickpea under middle Indo-Gangetic plains · 2012

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    No tillage significantly reduced chickpea grain yield relative to normal tillage.

    Impact of irrigation and crop residue management on maize (Zea mays)– chickpea (Cicer arietinum) sequence under no tillage conditions · 2014 · compared with normal tillage

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Reduced tillage did not affect chickpea yield.

    Short-term Response of Chickpea Yield, Total Soil Carbon, and Soil Nitrogen to Different Tillage and Organic Amendment Regimes · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Deep occasional tillage caused up to 49% chickpea grain yield loss.

    Short-term residual effects of occasional tillage on crop performance, soil water, and water-use efficiency in a 10-year no-till system under a dry Mediterranean climate · 2024

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Tillage systems did not change chickpea yield.

    Sustaining chickpea production under varying tillage systems and fertility levels in Vertisols of Malwa Plateau · 2009

    Opposite direction

88 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.