Abstract
The aims of this study were to determine how the tillage system and residual N of soil affected chickpea yield and its trait in rotation with wheat under Central Anatolia Region. In this study, two tillage methods viz. conventional and reduced tillage, three crop rotations; wheat-wheat; wheat-fallow; wheat-chickpea and four N levels of 0, 50, 100, 150 kg ha -1 were evaluated for four years duration (2012)(2013)(2014)(2015). Tillage methods were maintained into main plots, crop rotation into subplots and N levels into sub-sub plots. Only chickpea in continuous rotation with wheat was examined in this study. The results were evaluated according to split plot design with three replicates. Grain yield was higher under conventional tillage (CT) than reduced tillage (RT) in both of the growing seasons. Some important yield components were higher under RT than CT especially in the second growing season. These differences of tillage methods may also be due to climatic conditions. Residual fertilizer N significantly affected chickpea grain yield which increased with 100 and 150 kg N ha -1 levels. Results also indicated that; conventional tillage may be more appropriate for chickpea in rotation with wheat. Chickpea grain yield was also affected when N fertilizer applied to wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave higher chickpea grain yield than reduced tillage in both seasons.
- Treatment
- conventional tillage (CT)e0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- both of the growing seasonse0
- Comparator
- reduced tillage (RT)e0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield was higher under conventional tillage (CT) than reduced tillage (RT) in both of the growing seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Some yield components were higher under reduced tillage than conventional tillage, especially in the second season.
- Treatment
- RTe0
- Outcome
- Some important yield componentse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- especially in the second growing seasone0
- Comparator
- CTe0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Some important yield components were higher under RT than CT especially in the second growing season”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual nitrogen at 100 kg N ha -1 significantly increased chickpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- 100e0
- Outcome
- chickpea grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 100e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Residual fertilizer N significantly affected chickpea grain yield which increased with 100 and 150 kg N ha -1 levels”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual nitrogen at 150 kg N ha -1 significantly increased chickpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- 150 kg N ha -1e0
- Outcome
- chickpea grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Residual fertilizer N significantly affected chickpea grain yield which increased with 100 and 150 kg N ha -1 levels”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer applied to wheat affected chickpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- N fertilizer applied to wheate0
- Outcome
- Chickpea grain yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Chickpea grain yield was also affected when N fertilizer applied to wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend conventional tillage for chickpea grown in rotation with wheat.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Outcome
- conventional tillagee0
- Qualifier
- in rotation with wheate0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“conventional tillage may be more appropriate for chickpea in rotation with wheat”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
93 papers more in this group
See all 97 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.