Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Effects of Different Tillage Systems and Soil Residual Nitrogen on Chickpea Yield and Yield Components in Rotation with Wheat under Dry Farming Areas

Nihal Kayan; Imren Kutlu; Nazife Gozde Ayter; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine how the tillage system and residual N of soil affected chickpea yield and its trait in rotation with wheat under Central Anatolia Region. In this study, two tillage methods viz. conventional and reduced tillage, three crop rotations; wheat-wheat; wheat-fallow; wheat-chickpea and four N levels of 0, 50, 100, 150 kg ha -1 were evaluated for four years duration (2012)(2013)(2014)(2015). Tillage methods were maintained into main plots, crop rotation into subplots and N levels into sub-sub plots. Only chickpea in continuous rotation with wheat was examined in this study. The results were evaluated according to split plot design with three replicates. Grain yield was higher under conventional tillage (CT) than reduced tillage (RT) in both of the growing seasons. Some important yield components were higher under RT than CT especially in the second growing season. These differences of tillage methods may also be due to climatic conditions. Residual fertilizer N significantly affected chickpea grain yield which increased with 100 and 150 kg N ha -1 levels. Results also indicated that; conventional tillage may be more appropriate for chickpea in rotation with wheat. Chickpea grain yield was also affected when N fertilizer applied to wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave higher chickpea grain yield than reduced tillage in both seasons.

Treatment
conventional tillage (CT)e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
both of the growing seasonse0
Comparator
reduced tillage (RT)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was higher under conventional tillage (CT) than reduced tillage (RT) in both of the growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some yield components were higher under reduced tillage than conventional tillage, especially in the second season.

Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
Some important yield componentse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
especially in the second growing seasone0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Some important yield components were higher under RT than CT especially in the second growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrogen at 100 kg N ha -1 significantly increased chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
100e0
Outcome
chickpea grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual fertilizer N significantly affected chickpea grain yield which increased with 100 and 150 kg N ha -1 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrogen at 150 kg N ha -1 significantly increased chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
150 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
chickpea grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual fertilizer N significantly affected chickpea grain yield which increased with 100 and 150 kg N ha -1 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer applied to wheat affected chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
N fertilizer applied to wheate0
Outcome
Chickpea grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea grain yield was also affected when N fertilizer applied to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1289 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conventional tillage for chickpea grown in rotation with wheat.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
conventional tillagee0
Qualifier
in rotation with wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage may be more appropriate for chickpea in rotation with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1214 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.