Abstract
This research was conducted under dry farming conditions in the Research and Application Farm fields of the Central Research Institute for Field Crops Directorate (TARM) in 2020 and 2021. The study investigated the effects of three different tillage methods [traditional tillage (T1), conservation tillage (T2), and no-till (T3)] and four different fertilizer applications [no fertilizer (G0), DAP (G1), 20-20-0 conventional compound fertilizer (G2), and 15-20-0 organomineral fertilizer (G3)] on emergence days, flowering days, harvest maturity, plant density per square meter, weed population, and soil moisture content in chickpea cultivation. According to tillage methods, the results for the first and second years were as follows: Days to emergence ranged from 22 to 37 and from 15 to 20, respectively. Days to flowering ranged from 44 to 53 and from 59 to 63. Days to harvest maturity varied between 113 and 117 days and 107 and108 days. Plant density per square meter ranged from 16.67 to37.3 and from 24.82 to 30.60 plants.Weed population ranged from 18.37 to43.95 weeds m-² and from 11.56 to34.44 weeds m-². Soil moisture content ranged from 14.99% to 16.87% and from 12.55% to 14.17%. It was determined that the basal fertilization (Nitrogen) and non-fertilized production models did not significantly affect days to emergence, days to flowering, harvest maturity, weed population, and soil moisture content in either year of the study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Days to emergence across tillage methods ranged from 22 to 37 in year one and 15 to 20 in year two.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Outcome
- Days to emergencee0
- Value
- 22 to 37 and from 15 to 20e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to emergence ranged from 22 to 37 and from 15 to 20, respectively.”
t0“in Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Days to flowering across tillage methods ranged from 44 to 53 and 59 to 63.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- Days to floweringe0
- Value
- 44 to 53 and from 59 to 63e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to flowering ranged from 44 to 53 and from 59 to 63.”
t0“in Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvest maturity across tillage methods ranged from 113 to 117 days and 107 to 108 days.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- Days to harvest maturitye0
- Value
- 113 and 117 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days to harvest maturity varied between 113 and 117 days and 107 and108 days.”
t0“in Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant density ranged from 16.67 to 37.3 and 24.82 to 30.60 plants per square meter.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- Plant density per square metere0
- Value
- 24.82 to 30.60 plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant density per square meter ranged from 16.67 to37.3 and from 24.82 to 30.60 plants.”
t0“in Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed population ranged from 18.37 to 43.95 and 11.56 to 34.44 weeds per square meter.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- Weed populatione0
- Value
- 18.37 to43.95 weeds m-²e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed population ranged from 18.37 to43.95 weeds m-² and from 11.56 to34.44 weeds m-².”
t0“in Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture ranged from 14.99% to 16.87% and 12.55% to 14.17%.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- Soil moisture contente0
- Value
- 14.99% to 16.87%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil moisture content ranged from 14.99% to 16.87% and from 12.55% to 14.17%.”
t0“in Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal nitrogen fertilization did not significantly affect emergence, flowering, or harvest maturity in either year.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- basal fertilization (Nitrogen)e0
- Outcome
- days to emergence, days to flowering, harvest maturitye0
- Comparator
- non-fertilized production modelse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the basal fertilization (Nitrogen) and non-fertilized production models did not significantly affect days to emergence, days to flowering, harvest maturity, weed population, and soil moisture content in either year of the study.”
t0“in Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal nitrogen fertilization did not significantly affect weed population or soil moisture in either year.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- basal fertilization (Nitrogen)e0
- Outcome
- weed population, and soil moisture contente0
- Comparator
- non-fertilized production modelse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the basal fertilization (Nitrogen) and non-fertilized production models did not significantly affect days to emergence, days to flowering, harvest maturity, weed population, and soil moisture content in either year of the study.”
t0“in Chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →fertilization · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 326 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →nitrogen · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.