Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grafted melon produced 22.70%-56.25% more yield than the non-grafting check.

A claim from Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted melon produced 22.70%-56.25% more yield than the non-grafting check.

Taxon
oriental melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Tongue grafting methode5
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
moree4
Value
22.70%-56.25%e4
Comparator
non-grafting checke3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65
e3

“Compared with non-grafting check,no significant difference in the taste,flavor,quality and central soluble solid content were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–600
e4

“the grafted melon produced 22.70%-56.25% more yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–660
e5

“Tongue grafting method was used to grafting interspecific squash Qingmeng No.1 with oriental melon Wangzi No.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–292

Title

Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house.

Shumei Zhao; Xiao ZhengLu; Shen YanGang Zhongguo gua-cai 2010

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-771e82f45432c8a22b4a252b6b45e246b9d12d5ec142631e402a3ed7ec035434 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.