Paper · 2010 · Zhongguo gua-cai

Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house.

Shumei Zhao; Xiao ZhengLu; Shen YanGang

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grafting cultivation technology is use to overcome problem of mono-cropping,Fusarium wilt,and to increase yield and return of oriental melon(Cucumis melo)production in plastic-house.Tongue grafting method was used to grafting interspecific squash Qingmeng No.1 with oriental melon Wangzi No.2.The results showed that Qingmeng No.1 and Wangzi No.2 had good compatibility with survival rate 90%.The grafted seedlings had strong vigor and were highly resistant to wilt.Compared with non-grafting check,no significant difference in the taste,flavor,quality and central soluble solid content were observed.However,the grafted melon produced 22.70%-56.25% more yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting Qingmeng No.1 and Wangzi No.2 had good compatibility, with 90% survival rate.

Taxon
oriental melonCucumis melot0
Material
Qingmeng No.1 and Wangzi No.2e1
Outcome
survival ratee1
Value
90%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Qingmeng No.1 and Wangzi No.2 had good compatibility with survival rate 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–392 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted oriental melon seedlings had strong vigor.

Taxon
oriental melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
vigore2
Qualifier
stronge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grafted seedlings had strong vigor and were highly resistant to wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–465 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted oriental melon seedlings were highly resistant to Fusarium wilt.

Taxon
oriental melonCucumis melot0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
wilte2
Direction
highly resistante2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“overcome problem of mono-cropping,Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grafted seedlings had strong vigor and were highly resistant to wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted melon showed no significant difference in taste, flavor and quality compared with non-grafted check.

Taxon
oriental melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Tongue grafting methode5
Outcome
taste,flavor,qualitye3
Direction
no significant differencee3
Comparator
non-grafting checke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with non-grafting check,no significant difference in the taste,flavor,quality and central soluble solid content were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–600 · show in text ↑
e5

“Tongue grafting method was used to grafting interspecific squash Qingmeng No.1 with oriental melon Wangzi No.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted melon showed no significant difference in central soluble solid content compared with non-grafted check.

Taxon
oriental melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Tongue grafting methode5
Outcome
central soluble solid contente3
Direction
no significant differencee3
Comparator
non-grafting checke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with non-grafting check,no significant difference in the taste,flavor,quality and central soluble solid content were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–600 · show in text ↑
e5

“Tongue grafting method was used to grafting interspecific squash Qingmeng No.1 with oriental melon Wangzi No.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted melon produced 22.70%-56.25% more yield than the non-grafting check.

Taxon
oriental melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Tongue grafting methode5
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
moree4
Value
22.70%-56.25%e4
Comparator
non-grafting checke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Use grafting technique to produce oriental melon in plastic-house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with non-grafting check,no significant difference in the taste,flavor,quality and central soluble solid content were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–600 · show in text ↑
e4

“the grafted melon produced 22.70%-56.25% more yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–660 · show in text ↑
e5

“Tongue grafting method was used to grafting interspecific squash Qingmeng No.1 with oriental melon Wangzi No.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–292 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

19 papers: 9 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

grafting · quality: general · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.