Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pre-sowing rhizotorphin inoculation contributed to biological nitrogen accumulation.

A claim from Dependences of the yield of common beans on agrotechnical factors in the zone of chestnut soils of the Astrakhan region · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing rhizotorphin inoculation contributed to biological nitrogen accumulation.

Taxon
common beansPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
pre-sowing inoculation of seeds with rhizotorphine1
Outcome
accumulation of biological nitrogene0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40
e0

“and also contributes to the accumulation of biological nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–971
e1

“pre-sowing inoculation of seeds with rhizotorphin, which ensures a stable yield of common beans on drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–905

Title

Dependences of the yield of common beans on agrotechnical factors in the zone of chestnut soils of the Astrakhan region

A.I. Belyaev; Yu.N. Petrov; V.N. Pavlenko; et al. BIO Web of Conferences 2023. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20237101005

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-792f9e8bcacbc6a02caabfafd2dfa9ad1d3b9ae99498b1609a1b2d6658dfe693 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Bean tissue inoculated with P. phaseolicola accumulated ornithine.

    Mode of Action of the Toxin from Pseudomonas phaseolicola · 1972

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Wilt inoculation did not affect early free salicylic acid.

    Priming Bean Seedlings to Boost Natural Plant Defenses Against Common Bacterial Wilt: Salicylic Acid Responses to Chemical Primers (Part 1) · 2023

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    EM kept aldehyde content similar to untreated plants.

    Influence of Tytanit® and EM on biochemical, physiological, and qualitative parameters of common bean · 2021 · compared with untreated plants

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Bacterial inoculations reduced the accumulation of Cr in P. vulgaris plant tissues

    Cellulosimicrobium funkei-like enhances the growth of Phaseolus vulgaris by modulating oxidative damage under Chromium(VI) toxicity · 2016

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Inoculation increased the lactic acid concentration of the silages compared with untreated silages.

    The effect of harvest date and inoculation on the yield, fermentation characteristics and feeding value of forage pea and field bean silages · 2001 · compared with untreated

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Bean inoculation significantly increased nitrogen concentration and content.

    Symbiotic Efficiency of Native Rhizobia Nodulating Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Soils of Western Kenya · 2014

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Dual inoculation significantly increased shoot magnesium in organic plants.

    Rhizobia and AM Fungal Inoculation Improve Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Bean Plants Under Organic Fertilization · 2003

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Mycorrhizal inoculation increased plant Zn concentration.

    Response of kidney bean to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and mycorrhizal dependency in P and Zn deficient soils · 2006

    Same direction

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.