Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FIRB sowing with every furrow irrigation significantly increased effective tillers, grains per spike and grain yield over flat sowing with flood irrigation and FIRB with alternate furrow irrigation.

A claim from Productivity and input efficiencies of FIRB planted wheat as influenced by nitrogen levels under deficit irrigation · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRB sowing with every furrow irrigation significantly increased effective tillers, grains per spike and grain yield over flat sowing with flood irrigation and FIRB with alternate furrow irrigation.

Treatment
FIRB sowing with every furrow irrigation methode1
Outcome
number of effective tillers per metre row length, grains per spike and grain yielde1
Direction
significantly highere1
Comparator
flat sowing with flood irrigatione1
Setting
sandy loam soil at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisare0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FIRB planted wheat (Triticum aestivum (L.) as influenced by nitrogen levels under deficit irrigation on sandy loam soil at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–305
e1

“significantly higher number of effective tillers per metre row length, grains per spike and grain yield were registered under FIRB sowing with every furrow irrigation method over flat sowing with flood irrigation (conventional method or farmer practice) and FIRB sowing with alternate furrow irrigation method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1315

Title

Productivity and input efficiencies of FIRB planted wheat as influenced by nitrogen levels under deficit irrigation

Parveen Kumar; Anil Kumar; Rohtas Kumar; et al. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2022. doi:10.5958/2455-7145.2022.00040.6

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-7b3b1fb89d8e440aaaab3d6be69b3e50dc3958d898f09949680647b796c8d10c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.