Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FIRB planting with every furrow irrigation produced 13.93% higher yield than flat sowing with flood irrigation.

A claim from Productivity and input efficiencies of FIRB planted wheat as influenced by nitrogen levels under deficit irrigation · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRB planting with every furrow irrigation produced 13.93% higher yield than flat sowing with flood irrigation.

Treatment
FIRB planting with every furrow irrigation methode2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
13.93e2
Comparator
flat sowing with flood irrigatione2
Setting
sandy loam soil at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisare0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FIRB planted wheat (Triticum aestivum (L.) as influenced by nitrogen levels under deficit irrigation on sandy loam soil at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–305
e2

“FIRB planting with every furrow irrigation method produced 17.37 and 13.93 percent higher yield over FIRB planting with alternate furrow irrigation and flat sowing with flood irrigation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1703

Title

Productivity and input efficiencies of FIRB planted wheat as influenced by nitrogen levels under deficit irrigation

Parveen Kumar; Anil Kumar; Rohtas Kumar; et al. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2022. doi:10.5958/2455-7145.2022.00040.6

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d931a9c51c59fa0b10ccb1bc21b6f9c0b3cc45449c8d66f8290e6197b620e3c5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.