Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilizer did not alleviate the compaction-related detrimental effect on corn K uptake versus no fertilizer.

A claim from SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SOIL POROSITY, LEAF NUTRIENT COMPOSITION AND YIELD FOR CERTAIN CORN ROTATIONS AT TWO FERTILITY LEVELS ON BROOKSTON CLAY · 1979

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer did not alleviate the compaction-related detrimental effect on corn K uptake versus no fertilizer.

Treatment
Fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
failed to alleviatee0
Comparator
no fertilizere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer application failed to alleviate the detrimental effects of this compaction on K uptake by the plants in comparison with uptake where no fertilizer was applied throughout the experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–314
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94

Title

SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SOIL POROSITY, LEAF NUTRIENT COMPOSITION AND YIELD FOR CERTAIN CORN ROTATIONS AT TWO FERTILITY LEVELS ON BROOKSTON CLAY

E. F. BOLTON; V. A. DIRKS; W. I. FINDLAY Canadian Journal of Soil Science 1979. doi:10.4141/cjss79-001

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-7bd68b59fa2ea84bd20dd14767df9c94d26e42e5822c67790a762eb5804429dd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,155 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.