Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 50% NPK, humic acid, EM and magnetite combination produced higher pea growth than 100% NPK alone, without a significant difference.

A claim from EFFECT OF MAGNETITE, HUMIC ACID AND BIOFERTLIZER AS WELL AS N, P AND K LEVELS APPLICATION ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% NPK, humic acid, EM and magnetite combination produced higher pea growth than 100% NPK alone, without a significant difference.

Treatment
50% NPK and spraying plants with humic acid + EM plus magnetite at 150 kg/fede0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100% NPK alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% NPK and spraying plants with humic acid + EM plus magnetite at 150 kg/fed recorded higher values of plant growth and green pod yield per feddan as compared to 100% NPK alone (control) without significant difference between both treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1336
t0

“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–135

Title

EFFECT OF MAGNETITE, HUMIC ACID AND BIOFERTLIZER AS WELL AS N, P AND K LEVELS APPLICATION ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.)

Kawser Dawa; A. Amer; M. Helmy Journal of Plant Production 2013. doi:10.21608/jpp.2013.72998

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-7cc705ff669f878406a85788a9ff8abd0f837dfa3b63c63e83ca1d96321cada7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

magnetite · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.