Intervention effectmodel-written summary

2,4-D + AgNO3 did not differ significantly in haploid embryo formation and plant regeneration.

A claim from PTC Variation in the Induction of Haploidy and Polyembryony in Spring Wheat through Wheat × Maize System · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D + AgNO3 did not differ significantly in haploid embryo formation and plant regeneration.

Treatment
2,4-D + AgNO3e0
Outcome
formation of haploid embryos and regeneration of plants from theme0
Direction
no significant variationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant variations by the application of 2,4-D and 2,4-D + AgNO3 for the formation of haploid embryos and regeneration of plants from them.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–951
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75

Title

PTC Variation in the Induction of Haploidy and Polyembryony in Spring Wheat through Wheat × Maize System

F. Sharmeen; Lutfur Rahman; MT Alam; et al. 2005

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-7d8bf74cbb618ee38f292f4b724c348c3ba6b4134fb20a6aff0404c9e1fc76df · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

2,4-D · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 35 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

silver(1+) nitrate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.