Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A row spacing of 14.7 cm significantly increased grain and straw yield per square metre compared with 29.4 cm.

A claim from Effect of zero tillage system, seeding rate and row spacing on growth, yield and its components of bread wheat in moderate rainfall area in ninevah province · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A row spacing of 14.7 cm significantly increased grain and straw yield per square metre compared with 29.4 cm.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
14.7cm row spacinge3
Outcome
grains and straw yield/m2e3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
29.4cm row spacinge3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bread wheat (cv. Cham-6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–437
e3

“100kg/ha seeding rate and 14.7cm row spacing factors increased significantly No. of plants, tillers and spikes/m2, grains and straw yield/m2 comparing with 80kg/ha and 29.4cm row spacing respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–846

Title

Effect of zero tillage system, seeding rate and row spacing on growth, yield and its components of bread wheat in moderate rainfall area in ninevah province

Abdulsattar Alrijabo; Saad A. Asmair; Hisham Abdulrahman Ahmed MELSpace (ICARDA (The International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas)) 2014

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-7e176d30c8ce0cc4ae0b2b175f0067e03e7756c49a8e62eecbdbb1b2138ba3e0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.