Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Integration of second irrigation with 50% organic manure and 50% RDF (T6) gave significantly higher growth and productivity in lentil than other treatments.

A claim from Enhancing the Yield of Lentils (Lens culinaris) in Greater Noida (U.P.) by Improving Irrigation Frequency, Nutrient Management Techniques, and Soil Conservation Techniques (Mulching) at Greater Noida (U.P.), India · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integration of second irrigation with 50% organic manure and 50% RDF (T6) gave significantly higher growth and productivity in lentil than other treatments.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
integration of second irrigation and 50% Organic manure+ 50% R.D.F.e1
Outcome
growth and productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results indicated that integration of second irrigation and 50% Organic manure+ 50% R.D.F. (T6) demonstrated significantly higher growth and productivity in lentil compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–660

Title

Enhancing the Yield of Lentils (Lens culinaris) in Greater Noida (U.P.) by Improving Irrigation Frequency, Nutrient Management Techniques, and Soil Conservation Techniques (Mulching) at Greater Noida (U.P.), India

Varun Tripathi; Nyaken Chisi International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2024. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2024.1311.007

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-7eba26aa42fbea14c34edd9aa946b29bd0761f4490781e293b036308d1c74a5a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.