Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Finger millet equivalent yield, land-equivalent ratio and competition ratio were maximized in the finger millet + green gram intercropping system.

A claim from Crop diversification strategies for yield enhancement in finger millet-based cropping systems · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Finger millet equivalent yield, land-equivalent ratio and competition ratio were maximized in the finger millet + green gram intercropping system.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae5
Treatment
finger millet + green gram intercropping systeme5
Outcome
finger millet equivalent yield (FMEY), land-equivalent ratio (LER), competition ratio (CR)e5
Direction
maximizede5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“productivity metrics such as finger millet equivalent yield (FMEY), land-equivalent ratio (LER), competition ratio (CR), and area-time equivalent ratio (ATER) were maximized in the finger millet + green gram intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–2164

Title

Crop diversification strategies for yield enhancement in finger millet-based cropping systems

Shilpa; B. S. Lalitha; K. H. Nagaraj; et al. Frontiers in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3389/fagro.2025.1644473

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-7f2e77d2ff8222baffc6451a845a3ed7edfc7a2aefe6513b05f5caa9f94f5009 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

intercropping · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.